AlleyOop007
06-15-2010, 10:14 PM
I believe this little revolver to be more than 120 years old making it an antique, but its so well made I thought I would share it here to find out if anyone on this forum has one and to perhaps learn more about my own:
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolver1JPG.jpg
The barrel is 2 1/2 inches long (to provide some idea of its overall size). The grip panels are very delicately checkered ebony or darkly stained walnut. I didn't find any remnants of a finish when I removed the grip panels so I assume the revolver has always been "in the white" since it left the manufacturer.
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolver2JPG.jpg
It has a swiveling ejector rod similar to the 1895 Russian Nagant. Also note the opened loading gate at the rear of the cylinder.
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolver3JPG.jpg
They are difficult to read in this photo but the words JOHN SWINFEN and 79 BANK STREET are engraved in Italics in two lines one above and one below the sight groove on the top strap and MAIDSTONE is engraved in the same script in the flat on top of the barrel.
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolver4JPG.jpg
There are proof marks over every chamber on the cylinder, the frame and the barrel that have been identifed as British in origin:
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolverProofMark2JPG.jpg
Chamber mark and frame mark viewed from right side of revolver.
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolverProofMark3JPG.jpg
Barrel mark on left side of barrel.
I "Googled" John Swinfen and found a reference to John Swinfen, Gunmaker, at 79 Bank Street, in an old 1877 city directory for the city of Maidstone, Kent, a community that is 30 + miles SE of London. Additional surfing the net put me in touch with the local museum where a staff member did a little research after I sent pictures of the revolver. He advised me that John Swinfen was more of an importer/distributor than an actual maker and that most of Mr. Swinfen's products were made in Belgium and by other European manufacturers. The firearms, primarlily revolvers and shotguns as best as I can determine, were imported and Swinfen put his name and address on them for marketing purposes. The fellow informed me that they had a few of his revovers in the museum and that mine looks similar to the ones Swinfen sold in the 1880s.
I am curious to know if the .380 British is interchangeable with the .38 Short Colt or the .38 S&W? I've seen arguments for both and even a statement that the .38 S&W is too large in diameter to chamber. I know the last statement to be untrue with this revolver since I have chambered a 38 S&W with ease; the only problem was that the nose of the bullet extended a tiny amount beyond the face of the cylinder enough to prohibit the cylinder from turning.
I hope you find this little revolver and its history to be as interesting as I and that perhaps some readers may be able to provide some additional information about it.
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolver1JPG.jpg
The barrel is 2 1/2 inches long (to provide some idea of its overall size). The grip panels are very delicately checkered ebony or darkly stained walnut. I didn't find any remnants of a finish when I removed the grip panels so I assume the revolver has always been "in the white" since it left the manufacturer.
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolver2JPG.jpg
It has a swiveling ejector rod similar to the 1895 Russian Nagant. Also note the opened loading gate at the rear of the cylinder.
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolver3JPG.jpg
They are difficult to read in this photo but the words JOHN SWINFEN and 79 BANK STREET are engraved in Italics in two lines one above and one below the sight groove on the top strap and MAIDSTONE is engraved in the same script in the flat on top of the barrel.
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolver4JPG.jpg
There are proof marks over every chamber on the cylinder, the frame and the barrel that have been identifed as British in origin:
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolverProofMark2JPG.jpg
Chamber mark and frame mark viewed from right side of revolver.
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/uu236/AlleyOop_007/British%20Handguns/380JohnSwinfenRevolverProofMark3JPG.jpg
Barrel mark on left side of barrel.
I "Googled" John Swinfen and found a reference to John Swinfen, Gunmaker, at 79 Bank Street, in an old 1877 city directory for the city of Maidstone, Kent, a community that is 30 + miles SE of London. Additional surfing the net put me in touch with the local museum where a staff member did a little research after I sent pictures of the revolver. He advised me that John Swinfen was more of an importer/distributor than an actual maker and that most of Mr. Swinfen's products were made in Belgium and by other European manufacturers. The firearms, primarlily revolvers and shotguns as best as I can determine, were imported and Swinfen put his name and address on them for marketing purposes. The fellow informed me that they had a few of his revovers in the museum and that mine looks similar to the ones Swinfen sold in the 1880s.
I am curious to know if the .380 British is interchangeable with the .38 Short Colt or the .38 S&W? I've seen arguments for both and even a statement that the .38 S&W is too large in diameter to chamber. I know the last statement to be untrue with this revolver since I have chambered a 38 S&W with ease; the only problem was that the nose of the bullet extended a tiny amount beyond the face of the cylinder enough to prohibit the cylinder from turning.
I hope you find this little revolver and its history to be as interesting as I and that perhaps some readers may be able to provide some additional information about it.